wanna go HOME now...
Let's talk about things and stuff

topic list  |  new topic  |  authorish list

root: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us

parent: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by d.- on 2003-01-24 15:17:39

you are: the "Voice" inside my head. Thanks for the recommendation on the "Daily"... (are you also a Brit? -- like so many of the Taters here?) F.Y.I. And you should check out the Times of London (Jan. 15th, '003) and find John LeCarre's most excellent commentary entitled: The United States of America has Gone Mad -- it's long, but I feel it's onthemoney!

Reply to this

Comments:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by T.V.O.R on 2003-01-25 15:07:36  |  Reply to this
  Hi d, I've just read the full text of John LeCarre's essay "The United States Of America Has Gone Mad" in The Times(UK). I was impressed by his writing,it was eloquent and precise and avoided all the usual cliches and platitudes spoken on the subject.P.S I am from the fair city of London,no one here calls themselves Brits, I think its an Amercian thing.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by d.- on 2003-01-26 14:47:29  |  Reply to this
  dear 'voice' inside my head... I just received another e-mail for peace from a friend -- to paraphrase one quote in the article from Mother Teresa found her saying that she would not join an "anti-war" demonstration, yet she would join a "pro-peace" rally. There is a difference, yes? Gotta go -- "London's calling..."
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by d.- on 2003-01-26 15:07:36  |  Reply to this
  oh -- was there anything in particular you wanted me to read in the Daily???
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by T.V.O.R on 2003-01-26 16:26:15  |  Reply to this
  Hi d, no,nothing in particular,I just admire the Mirror's unexpected stance in being out and out against the war. Spookily in your entry you said "London's cslling" which is a song by The Clash and the first record I ever bought.P.S whats papers do you read.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by T.V.O.R on 2003-01-26 16:28:59  |  Reply to this
  Hi d, it shoud read "London's calling" how did that "s" get there.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by d.- on 2003-01-27 14:57:31  |  Reply to this
  Hello... I don't get the spooky entry part -- I was just hearing that one lyric in my head as I was writing to you (in London) -- so I guess you ARE the 'voice' inside my head! Oh -- if the term 'Brit' is considered slang and/or derogatory in any way, all apologies. I guess what I'm wondering what the generic catch-all term is for ALL people from England? If one is NOT from London, then how is one called? Are you all Englanders then?? Thanks for the communiques....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by T.V.O.R on 2003-01-27 16:05:02  |  Reply to this
  Hi d, Iam sorry if I sounded a bit offish about the Brit thing,I don't mean to. You can call me anything you like. In fact Brit will do just do just great. When I said "spookily" I just meant it was a coincidence that you mentioned the lyric of a song I like, I didn't mean it to sound like an X-file moment. Communiques!....now your making fun of me.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by d.- on 2003-01-28 15:08:26  |  Reply to this
  no! no! no! -- I actually DO USE words like: missives and communiques when referring to correspondence. I would never make fun of you... Call you anything I like?? -- just NOT late for dinner, yes?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by d.- on 2003-01-28 15:08:29  |  Reply to this
  no! no! no! -- I actually DO USE words like: missives and communiques when referring to correspondence. I would never make fun of you... Call you anything I like?? -- just NOT late for dinner, yes?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by T.V.O.R on 2003-01-29 09:40:41  |  Reply to this
  Hi d, Try it...you might like it..WWW.pantsmc.cream.org/index.cgi. It's an aquired taste.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by T.V.O.R on 2003-01-29 09:48:56  |  Reply to this
  The "C" acquired a life of its own.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by d.- on 2003-01-31 13:57:26  |  Reply to this
  I tried it -- and I liked it! There ARE signs of intelligent life in cyberspace thank god... I hope to be 'family' there as well. Thanks for the referral.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by T.V.O.R on 2003-01-31 15:26:50  |  Reply to this
  That's brilliant!, I thought you might have found it boring. You'll bring the site international status....God bless the internet. When are you going to join in.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by Wash! on 2003-02-01 14:58:03  |  Reply to this
  Indeed "God bless the internet": a nice quote from American Pie... me favourite film! Wash!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by d.- on 2003-02-01 16:06:07  |  Reply to this
  ok. I had a synchronistic moment just now... I just sent an e-mail to a friend IMMEDIATELY BEFORE bouncing over here -- and I mean seconds. Guess how I signed off? That's right: God bless the internet at this time in history!! Perfection.... (P.S. What's that you say? Moi? Bringing international status to anyone, anywhere, at any time? I've been a legend in my own mind for some time now!) (P.P.S I DID join in! I went for just the right nom de plume -- catch me if you can!)
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us by T.V.O.R on 2003-02-01 16:45:36  |  Reply to this