| |
-- no, DAHling, they did not mix spelling -- legalize with a "z" is the American-English (and correct) version. Your version, of course is the British variant. (Oh you deviant variants!)
| Re: Re: Re: should we legalize brugs
by Wash!
on 2004-07-30 16:30:51
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Oh d-.d-., i am fully aware of the two variants, but i'm also very aware of which one is 'better'. I'm not biased at all, of course!!
Brugs? Drugs? Slugs? Bugs? Mugs? You're guess is as good as mine on that one!!! I'd like this topic to take a "Should we legaliSe slugs" conotation, though! I'd be interested to hear your views on that one, especially you, Johnny G!
| Re: Re: Re: Re: should we legalize brugs
by Kid
on 2004-07-30 23:41:42
|
Reply to this
|
| |
We can't legalise 'brugs'. If we did that, we'd have to legalise all similar misspellings and mispronunciations (drigs, druks, drugz...all sorts), and then what would we have? A new generation of people who are lethargic and unfocused, mainly as a result of the fact that they can use brugs whenever they want to... No. It has to be right..
|
| Re: Re: Re: Re: should we legalize brugs
by d.-
on 2004-07-31 15:51:00
|
Reply to this
|
| |
why not legaliZe slugs? -- my god, our pathetic medical system has gone full circle now. Doctors have 'reinvented'
the leech! (for crissake!) Apparently they clean up wounds real nice -- (eewwww). This is it? The 'new' medicine? Give me a FUCKing break! would you please? My point being, that it's only a matter of time until they 'reinvent' the slug. *** LEGALIZE SLUGS NOW!!! ***
|
|
|
