|Let's talk about||
pink=rubbish by lost prophet on 2002-09-10 14:15:42
well after reading the 'today' page i just thought i would add that i think pink is complete trash and not worth listening to, unless you are under 12 or some weird teeny-bopper that is. sorry to whoever writes the today thing (i still have no idea whos sight this is or why it is here) but she's boring repetative manufactured pop, which is only played on rubbish english radio stations (ie: capital)
Reply to this
|Re: pink=rubbish by Kid. on 2002-09-11 01:21:48 | Reply to this|
That's not entirely true. I've come to notice that she's not as pretty as Britney Spears, but I have a housemate who finds Pink (facially, not in attitude, style and music, I ought to say) very attractive.
Although I ought to argue the point of women who aren't trading off their looks getting into mainstream music, (As you know, I'm partial to a few of Madonna's tunes) I don't think P!nk is very good.
Still, she's better than Nicklecrack.
|Re: pink=rubbish by tommie on 2002-09-11 05:12:54 | Reply to this|
|...and she's better than Michael Hutchence.|
|Re: pink=rubbish by Tetra Grammaton on 2002-09-24 11:51:35 | Reply to this|
|You can say that you don't like it, but whatever else it is, it is not manufactured. Listen to the songs that they DON'T play on the radio, and compare Missundaztood to the last, oh, N'Sync CD. Michael Hutchence is dead, isn't he? So hardly fair I think. Though, hmm, Mozart - also dead. Never mind.|