topic list  |  new topic  |  authorish list

root: pink=rubbish

parent: Re: pink=rubbish

Re: Re: pink=rubbish by lost prophet on 2002-09-11 13:59:13

i take it you mean nicklebak? well while they aren't the best grunge act around by a long shot, at the moment that award should go to the vines, definitely not puddle of mudd who SUCK live when i saw them supporting koRn. anyway, got sidetracked, nickleback are better that p!nk will ever be, and never again is a fairly good song. and even those of you who don't like grunge would probably agree that how you remind me was excellent, if far to overplayed.

Reply to this

Comments:

Never Again? by Kid on 2002-09-12 01:43:53  |  Reply to this

If that's the new one from the 'Crack (what? Am I taking it too far? Yes. But I like the idea of knowing Nickleback as The Crack) then its rather poo. Its a bored chord sequence and a crappy chorus. I won't get drawn into debating bands into pigeon-holes, I'll just say that I don't like the Vines. They ruined a perfectly good Jools Holland for me. We had BDB, Del Amitri, Suzanna Bacca (sp.) and The Vines. Wasn't good. They didn't fit in. Re: Never Again? by lost prophet on 2002-09-12 11:38:59  |  Reply to this   No, the new song is too bad, and yes, that is poo Vines? by Tetra Grammaton on 2002-09-24 11:52:44  |  Reply to this   Are they the ones doing the bad early-60s Rolling Stone impersonation? Re: Vines? by Me on 2002-10-16 04:08:58  |  Reply to this   Actually the Vines are really good, and today their sound is very individual.