wanna go HOME now...
Let's talk about things and stuff

topic list  |  new topic  |  authorish list

root: pink=rubbish

parent: Re: pink=rubbish

Re: Re: pink=rubbish by lost prophet on 2002-09-11 13:59:13

i take it you mean nicklebak? well while they aren't the best grunge act around by a long shot, at the moment that award should go to the vines, definitely not puddle of mudd who SUCK live when i saw them supporting koRn. anyway, got sidetracked, nickleback are better that p!nk will ever be, and never again is a fairly good song. and even those of you who don't like grunge would probably agree that how you remind me was excellent, if far to overplayed.

Reply to this

Never Again? by Kid on 2002-09-12 01:43:53  |  Reply to this
  If that's the new one from the 'Crack (what? Am I taking it too far? Yes. But I like the idea of knowing Nickleback as The Crack) then its rather poo. Its a bored chord sequence and a crappy chorus.

I won't get drawn into debating bands into pigeon-holes, I'll just say that I don't like the Vines. They ruined a perfectly good Jools Holland for me. We had BDB, Del Amitri, Suzanna Bacca (sp.) and The Vines. Wasn't good. They didn't fit in.
Re: Never Again? by lost prophet on 2002-09-12 11:38:59  |  Reply to this
  No, the new song is too bad, and yes, that is poo
Vines? by Tetra Grammaton on 2002-09-24 11:52:44  |  Reply to this
  Are they the ones doing the bad early-60s Rolling Stone impersonation?
Re: Vines? by Me on 2002-10-16 04:08:58  |  Reply to this
  Actually the Vines are really good, and today their sound is very individual.